Here's a fun one... well, for me at least.
Facebook keeps a photo album of all the pictures you use for your profile. I grabbed this yesterday.

My profile photos are highly occasion-oriented. From the top row, left to right:
- Father's Day, Hawk win, Hawk playoffs, AZ vacation, St. Patty's
- Weird Star Trek episode, Burish comes back & fights, my birthday, ???, ???
- Steve!, My iMac photo, Christmas Cub gnome, KGG win football, Christmas IAWL
- Great White Horth Christmas eh, Thanksgiving stuffing, Halloween, I watch "Watchmen" again, my Indy half marathon
Millard Fillmore? That's a puzzler. He he.
a) Green me, AlOK, let's play.
Al gore co-authored an op-ed in the WSJ this week called
Toward Sustainable Capitalism.
Quiz: How many times does the word green appear in the article?
[play the Jeopardy theme in your head for a couple seconds]
Answer: Zero. Nada. Bupkis.
The word "climate" appears once, but not as part of the phrase "climate change".
"Global warming" doesn't appear, but Al Gore doesn't say "global warming" any more because it doesn't test well with us common folk.
When's the last time that Al Gore wrote anything that didn't include the word
green? This is a sample of one, but maybe it's the start of a shift away from Gore's "all in" on global warming, which has been (rightfully) beaten to a pulp in the last year. Even Al doesn't want to be a one-trick pony... there's money to be made!
I don't think you'll be able to read Al's whole article because of WSJ's subscription setup, but no matter. Your humble author is here to help. Al's breakthrough on sustaining capitalism is two-pronged:
- Make compensation take into account longer-term performance
- More shareholder say on executive compensation
That's it. Done.
It's pretty weird to see this bland and weak an editorial in the WSJ. So, why did this content-free, weak-ass shit make it to the pages of the WSJ... I guess when Al Gore come a-knocking, you put it in your paper. I guess.
b) Over-reach and UncertaintyLike a buzzing
vuvuzela at a South African soccer match (he he), we are pounded by the message, over and over again: you can't blame President Obama for this or that.
Well, we're 18 months in now, and we can start pointing to specific policies and decisions that inhibit, rather than foster, economic growth and job creation. The CEO of Verizon does just that in today's WSJ Notable & Quotable:
That's another subscription piece, but let me (again) give you a peek.
QOTD"By reaching into virtually every sector of economic life, government is injecting uncertainty into the marketplace and making it harder to raise capital and create new businesses."
- Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg
That's the money, right there...
over-reach and
uncertainty.
In investing in future endeavors, businesses must today ask:
- What additional regulations will I face?
- What additional taxes will I be paying?
- How much will I have to pay for my employees' health care/Obamacare?
- For larger corporations, what is the political risk of my activity?
All investment involves assessing the risk of a thing versus not doing it. If I can't answer the questions above, then I think I'll just hold on to my dough... in these difficult and uncertain times. Of course, our president hasn't even run a lemonade stand, let alone started a real business, so how was he to know?

Well, we're gliding along at 10% unemployment with massive tax hikes in line for next year and nebulous ObamaCare awaiting in the shadows. After 18 months of the Obama presidency, he has injected uncertainty and the fed's continue to over-reach into our economic system. For this, we can blame the Obama presidency.
scarlett... yow, bill